Any good conference will strive to provide at least three reviews, however, since conferences operate under tight deadlines and not all reviewers deliver as promised, it is not uncommon that you receive only two reviews. But writing more clearly will help you think more clearly and often reveals flaws or ideas!
For a section or sub-section, it can be as short as a sentence. Even for people whose primary learning modality is textual, another presentation of the ideas can clarify, fill gaps, or enable the reader to verify his or her understanding.
Who will read your paper? Never say "for various reasons". Mention briefly implementation language, platform, location, dependencies on other packages and minimum resource usage if pertinent. Papers introducing a new algorithm should conduct experiments comparing it to state-of-the-art algorithms for the same or similar problems.
Since the abstract will be used by search engines, be sure that terms that identify your work are found there.
Make every word count. Furthermore, the discussion should focus on differences from the successful technique, and if at all possible should provide general rules or lessons learned that will yield insight and help others to avoid such blind alleys in the future.
Checking your facts Engineers should be used to checking anything that is even remotely doubtful before committing to it. The technical program chair then collects the reviews and sorts the papers according to their average review scores.
Don't report more digits of precision than needed to convey your message. Finally, be civil and thankful the reviewers. Make the organization and results clear A paper should communicate the main ideas of your research such as the techniques and results early and clearly. For example, progress reports offer a great source because they remind you everything that was interesting or difficult.
This is better than organizing your response by reviewer, first addressing the comments of reviewer 1, then reviewer 2, and so forth.
The body of each figure might be a table, a graph, a diagram, a screenshot, or any other content. The next step is converting them into a brief outline and proceeding as stated above. Value a first draft not because it's great but because it's there.
Only submit if you aren't aware of show-stoppers and you are not embarrassed for the community to associate your name with the work, in its current form.
Equations should be referenced within the text as "Eq. At the early stages of your writing process, the main point is organizing major ideas instead of creating polished sentences.
Does the structure require the reader to remember to many details at once, before linking them? Author Names and Affiliations It is ASME policy that all those who have participated significantly in the technical aspects of a paper be recognized as co-authors or cited in the acknowledgments.
The reason for this is that the reader is experiencing the paper in real time; the paper is like a conversation between the authors and the reader. Start the paragraph with a brief heading or title about the point.
As a simple example of why, consider this 3-element grocery list written without the clarifying last comma: In the case of a conference, make sure to cite the work of the PC co-chairs and as many other PC members as are remotely plausible, as well as from anything relevant from the previous two proceedings.
In some conferences, there is an on-line discussion of papers among the reviewers for a particular paper. Proper experimental methodology should be employed. For uniformity, use the LaTeX2e graphics set, not the earlier psfigure set: Prefer singular to plural number.
Use a consistent number of digits of precision. One good way to automate these tasks is by writing a program or creating a script for a build system such as Make or Ant. Just as you should generally explain your technique first, and later show relationships with other work, it is also usually more effective to defer a detailed discussion of limitations to a later section rather than the main description of your technique.
Helpful technical writing practices There are some practices that will help you master technical paper writing faster and easier. Readers need to understand what the task is before they are convinced that they should pay attention to what you are saying about it.
If in doubt, consult a dictionary such as the on line Merriam Webster. Tables All tables should be numbered consecutively and have a caption consisting of the table number and a brief title. Order your text so your reader can easily see how related concepts are different and how they are similar.To write the body of the paper without knowing its broad outlines will take more time in the long run.
Another way of putting this is that writing the paper first will make writing the abstract faster, and writing the abstract first will make writing the paper faster.
The main purpose of writing any technical paper is to communicate major ideas, and this means that everything about your document must contribute to this basic goal. If any part of it fails to do that, you should change or delete it. Nov 12, · You can write a good technical paper on a variety of topics under Mechanical Engineering.
Choose a good topic to start with. You can get help from your faculty on this one. The objective of this paper was to propose a human expert-based approach to electrical peak demand management.
The proposed approach helped to allocate demand curtailments (MW) among. It is of the greatest importance that all technical, scientific, and mathematical information contained in the paper be checked with the utmost care. SI Units It is ASME policy that SI units of measurement be included in all papers.
Many papers have a submitted (and later published) conference version, along with a "full paper" technical report on the web. It's important to manage versions carefully, both in content and proliferation. My recommendation is, whenever possible, for the full paper to consist of simply the conference version plus appendices.Download